Archive for June, 2009

We would like to thank Leader John Boehner for his great efforts in reviewing H.R.2454 and the 309 page amendment which was submitted at 3:00AM the day of the vote. He and his staff were able to quickly read and analyze the “the most profound piece of legislation to come to this floor in a hundred years.”

Jessica R. Towhey posted the following on Ohio’s 8th Congressional District Blog for Congressman John Boehner.

Speaker Pelosi’s national energy tax is going to raise electricity prices, increase gasoline prices, and ship American jobs overseas to countries like China and India. This, we know.

It would be a bureaucratic nightmare overseen by a confusing web of government agencies that would take and redistribute trillions of dollars from family budgets and workers payrolls. This, we also know. Even Agriculture Committee Chairman Collin Peterson (D-MN) admitted in the Washington Post this morning that: “The truth is, nobody knows for sure how this is going to work.” How encouraging.

But what don’t we know? Here are some facts you may not know about Speaker Pelosi’s national energy tax:

Homebuyers Beware. Trying to save up for a new home? You may have to save up a little longer for your purchase. The Democrats’ bill would dramatically increase new home costs by mandating California’s expensive new building codes for the entire nation. Immediately upon enactment, the Democrats’ bill would demand a 30 percent increase in energy efficiency for new construction. A couple of years later, the Democrats’ bill would require an additional 50 percent improvement. These numbers were chosen with no concern for cost to consumers or feasibility in implementation.

Homebuilders Beware. The Democrats’ bill imposes new mandatory regulations and civil penalties for homebuilders. If your state refuses to accept the stringent and costly California building codes, the federal government may assess penalties. And don’t get too comfortable with the new mandatory regulations because the Democrats’ bill allows for “consensus-based” codes to supplant those outlined in the bill. So, as soon as you’ve invested your hard-earned money to comply with the bill’s mandates, the rug could get pulled from underneath you. Translation? You’ll pony up more and more money.

Home Sellers Beware. Having a hard time selling your home? Here’s one more hurdle to jump: all homes sales are conditioned upon an energy audit and a new energy rating assessment and energy labeling program for your home that’s outlined in the Democrats’ bill. And if you thought you could improve your property with a fresh coat of paint and some granite counters? Think again! Now your home will be subjected to a new energy rating assessment and energy labeling program that will penalize you for older windows, original fixtures, and dated appliances. So the Democrats’ bill would bring down the value of your home!

New Lights No Matter the Cost. As early as 2012, the Democrats’ bill eliminates all existing lighting technology used in many outdoor lighting fleets (parking lots, stadiums, secured facilities like power plants and factories). Just as an example, switching to the mandated technology in the bill will cost one small utility about $30 million in annual revenue. So you now have to comply with the new mandates for new lighting? Hold the phone. It is not clear that a feasible alternative technology is available for every existing lighting application – regardless of cost – which could force some businesses to close.

The consequences of Speaker Pelosi’s national energy tax for families and small businesses are real. It will drive up energy costs, send millions of jobs to countries like China and India, and place an especially heavy burden on rural America. There is a better way. House Republicans have proposed the American Energy Act, legislation that represents the fastest route to a cleaner environment, lower energy costs, and more American jobs. The legislation would:

* Increase environmentally-safe energy production on remote lands and far off our shores;
* Promote the use of alternative fuels that will reduce carbon emissions, such as nuclear, clean-coal, and renewable energy technologies; and
* Encourage increased efficiencies and cutting edge technologies to maximize America’s energy potential.

Today’s vote on Speaker Pelosi’s ill-advised national energy tax will have consequences for every American. It is a bad deal for America. And the American people will remember how their Members of Congress vote.

You can find the article at the following link on Congressman John Boehner’s blog:
Speaker Pelosi’s National Energy Tax: More Mandates, More Regulations, More Costs

The bill now goes to the Senate for a vote.

Contact your Senators today and ask them to vote NO on the Cap-&-Trade bill.
Contact Your Senators

Categories : Cap-&-Trade
Comments (1)

“The administrator and the (Obama) Administration have decided to move forward…and your comments do not help the legal or policy case for this decision.” Al McGarland EPA Official, (CBS News)

lan Carlin: “My view is…there is not currently any reason to regulate carbon dioxide. Global temperatures are roughly where they were in the mid-20th century. They’re not going up. If anything, they’re going down.”

Categories : Cap-&-Trade
Comments (0)

Marie Magleby and Monica Gabriel of CNSNews report that “House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D.-Calif.) will not give the public a week to review the final text of a health-care reform bill before it is voted on later this year.”

“When the stimulus bill came out earlier this year, members and citizens had less than two days to review the final version that came out of the conference committee before it was voted on,” CNSNews.com asked Pelosi on Thursday. “Will you commit to giving Americans at least a week to review the full conference version of the health care bill before it is voted on? And also will you commit to submitting the final version to the CBO [Congressional Budget Office] so that they can report the cost to the public?”

Pelosi would not commit to giving the public a week to review the bill:

“Well, we will abide by the regular order. You heard the question,” she said. “It was about having the health care bill out there a week in advance. We will have the regular order in terms of the appropriate amount of time, 48 hours in advance for amendments before you file the bill, another day before you can take up the bill.

“But this bill is something that has been unfolding before the American people for a long time now. The areas of controversy are well known,” said Pelosi.

You can read the full article here:
Pelosi Won’t Give Public a Week to Review Text of Health-Care Bill Before House Votes on It

What can you do?

Write your U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators now and get your friends and family to do the same.

Write Your U.S. Representative

Write Your U.S. Senators

Categories : Healthcare
Comments (0)

On Friday, June 26th., the House passed the American Clean Energy & Security Act, by a vote of 219 to 212. Eight Republicans voted in favor of the bill, while 44 Democrats and 168 Republican voted against. Fox News reports that on Saturday, June 27th, President Obama pressured the Senate to follow the House to quickly pass the American Clean Energy and Security Act.

“Hailing the House, President Obama put pressure on senators Saturday to follow its lead and pass legislation to limit greenhouse gas emissions, helping usher the U.S. into a new age of energy efficiency.

‘Now my call to every senator, as well as to every American, is this: We cannot be afraid of the future. And we must not be prisoners of the past,’ the president said in his weekly radio and Internet address. ‘Don’t believe the misinformation out there that suggests there is somehow a contradiction between investing in clean energy and economic growth. It’s just not true.’”

You can read the rest of the article here:

Obama Pressures Senate on Climate Change Measure

Categories : Cap-&-Trade
Comments (0)

See how your U.S. Representative voted on Cap-&-Trade aka “H.R. 2454 American Clean Energy and Security Act”:

House Roll Call for the H.R. 2454 American Clean Energy and Security Act

Categories : Cap-&-Trade
Comments (0)

If passed H.R.2454 would:

1. Reduce aggregate gross domestic product (GDP) by $9.6 trillion
2. Destroy an average of 1-3 million jobs, every year
3. Raise electricity rates 90 percent after adjusting for inflation
4. Raise inflation-adjusted gasoline prices by 74 percent
5. Raise residential natural gas prices by 55 percent
6. Raise an average family’s annual energy bill by $1,500 annually
7. Increase the federal debt by 26 percent, which is $29,150 per person
8. Decrease temperatures by only 100ths of a degree in 2050 and no more than two-tenths of a degree at the end of the century.



Click here to contact your Representative today!

Source for facts: http://www.americansolutions.com/take-action/call.php via the Heritage Foundation
See full article here: http://www.heritage.org/research/energyandenvironment/wm2450.cfm

Categories : Cap-&-Trade
Comments (0)

If you don’t contact your Representative NOW, you and your family will pay a boatload of money.

Tomorrow, Friday, June 26, the U.S. Congress will vote on H.R.2454 American Clean Energy And Security Act of 2009.

Call, Fax, and email your Representative now and tell him/her to vote NO.

So, you say that you don’t know how to contact your Representative. Here is a link that will show you how. It takes about 5 minutes to contact them:

Contact your Representative

Make time to do it now. You cannot afford to NOT contact your Representative.

The Wall Street Journal’s reports:

“House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has put cap-and-trade legislation on a forced march through the House, and the bill may get a full vote as early as Friday. It looks as if the Democrats will have to destroy the discipline of economics to get it done.”

According to the CBO, the climate legislation would cost the average household only $175 a year by 2020.

For starters, the CBO estimate is a one-year snapshot of taxes that will extend to infinity. Under a cap-and-trade system, government sets a cap on the total amount of carbon that can be emitted nationally; companies then buy or sell permits to emit CO2. The cap gets cranked down over time to reduce total carbon emissions.

The biggest doozy in the CBO analysis was its extraordinary decision to look only at the day-to-day costs of operating a trading program, rather than the wider consequences energy restriction would have on the economy. The CBO acknowledges this in a footnote: “The resource cost does not indicate the potential decrease in gross domestic product (GDP) that could result from the cap.”

The hit to GDP is the real threat in this bill. The whole point of cap and trade is to hike the price of electricity and gas so that Americans will use less. These higher prices will show up not just in electricity bills or at the gas station but in every manufactured good, from food to cars. Consumers will cut back on spending, which in turn will cut back on production, which results in fewer jobs created or higher unemployment. Some companies will instead move their operations overseas, with the same result.

When the Heritage Foundation did its analysis of Waxman-Markey, it broadly compared the economy with and without the carbon tax. Under this more comprehensive scenario, it found Waxman-Markey would cost the economy $161 billion in 2020, which is $1,870 for a family of four. As the bill’s restrictions kick in, that number rises to $6,800 for a family of four by 2035.

Read the full article here:

The Cap and Tax Fiction

Categories : Cap-&-Trade
Comments (1)

President Obama on Wednesday answered questions on rising costs, taxing benefits, and many other issues during an ABC News special on health care reform, “Questions for the President: Prescription for America.” Cato Institute scholars Michael D. Tanner and Michael F. Cannon respond to Obama’s claims. Learn more about health care reform at http://healthcare.cato.org.

Categories : Healthcare
Comments (0)

Categories : Healthcare, Obots
Comments (3)

You gotta love the way this public SERVANT thinks. We need more like him.

Read more about Congressman Chaffetz’s plan on his website here”

Census Should Partner With Post Office, Not ACORN

Comments (0)